Wednesday, May 25, 2005

The FMUP ( Flawed Modern / Ultramodern Physics ) Theory : Superultramodern Physics (SP) by Dr Kedar Joshi, PBSSI



The FMUP theory states that modern ( and ultramodern, as extremely modern ) physics is flawed, not absolutely but quite considerably. Following is a list (not necessarily exclusive) of those flaws with brief descriptions. [ The flaws are then resolved with the NSTP ( i.e. non - spatial mechanical ) framework, forming Superultramodern Physics. ]

1. Space - Time Entanglement -
Space and time are neither entangled in (strict)physical nor a logical sene. Time varies with space because production of appropriate states of consciousness. Time, like space is a mere experience or illusion, so to say. If the instructions for production in the non - spatial universal software are varied time would no longer be entangled with space.

2. Ontology / Physics of Space - Time Curvature, String Theory, Etc. -
Space - time curvature does not exist as a physical / real entity out there but is rather an idea in the universal NSTP (or, in computer terminology, universal non - spatial software). According to the string theories the strings are supposed to be infinitely thin, which is logically impossible. So the strings also exist, if at all, as ideas like space - time curvature.

3. Relativity of Mass -
The absolute speed of time does not imply that mass is relative. Mass has to be defined as a bulk / substance or quantity of matter. For example, in electron acceleration experiment, the mass of electron remains constant. However, its increasing resistance to acceleration (as its speed is increased) is controlled by the hidden non - spatial universal program.
As a corollary, mass is not transformed into energy but rather illusion / feelings are created as representation of energy. Mass, as a bulk, remains constant.

4. Time Machine and Relativity of Time -
Time, being a form of illusion or experience, is inherently relative. That is, it does not need relativity theory or the speed of light constant or absolute principle to prove that time is relative. Thus, to get into past is to reproduce the (non - spatial) states of consciousness as existed in the past (rather as we at present feel they existed in the past). And to build a time machine is to be able to actually reproduce them through varying the non - spatial universal software.

5. Newtons Laws of Motion -
Newtons laws of motion and his principle of universal gravitation is not logically necessary. They (that is the phenomena) could be changed by changing the non - spatial universal program.

6. Laws of Thermodynamics -
The same story as Newtons laws of motion.

7. Mechanism of Basic Forces -
Please consult my article The Superultramodern Scientific Explanation of the Fundamental Forces.

8. Uncertainty Principle -
The position and momentum of a particle could be measured with absolute certainty. The present limitations on measurement are technical and not theoretical. This is because particle and wave are two separate entities. If particle could be traced without disturbing it there would be no involvement of the wave feature. The behaviour of the particle is actually moderated by the logic of wave encrypted in the non - spatial universal program. However, when particle is replaced by wave ( i.e. particle disappears from the picture, as space is a form of illusion, and its reappearance is determined by the logic of wave ) the position of particle is determined with absolute randomness or apparent randomness ( if hidden variables are present ).

9. Schrodingers Cat Paradox -
According to the point no. 8, there is no superimposition of quantum states. Particle never exists at both places simultaneously and thus the situation does not involve any logical/conceptual paradoxes. Thus cat does not have to be both dead and alive or neither dead nor alive simultaneously. It is rather either dead or alive. And at any rate cats world of experience ( assuming it is conscious ) is physically different from that of the observers. So cat could be actually dead but found alive by the observer as death to cat means annihilation of all of its states of consciousness while its being alive to the observer means its being seen to be active spatially.

10. Einsteins Equivalence Principle ( Acceleration and Gravity are Equivalent ) -
This principle is a mere mathematical convenience, where the term mathematics is taken to mean in a very narrow or limited sense. Actually acceleration and gravity are different in the sense that gravity is one of the forms of acceleration.








About the Author
http://superultramodern.blogspot.com

Superultramodern Science (SS) by Dr Kedar Joshi, PBSSI, MRI



Superultramodern Science (SS) is supposed to be above/beyond/next to ultramodern science, the extremely modern science of today. SS is a creation of Dr Kedar Joshi (myself) and consists of 9 components. All of the 9 components are invented by the creator of SS.

1. Superultramodern Scientism ( SSism )

2. The NSTP ( Non - Spatial Thinking Process ) Theory : Non - Spatial Universal Mechanics (NSUM)

3. RGM ( Resolution of Great Mysteries )

4. The FMUP ( Flawed Modern / Ultramodern Physics ) Theory : Superultramodern Physics (SP)

5. ROS ( Rehabilitation of Occult Sciences ) : Astrology, Numerology, Telepathy (ANT).

6. Conmathematics ( Conceptual Mathematics ) : Superultramodern Mathematics (SM)

7. The FR ( Flawed Reason ) Theory

8. Superultramodern Universal Communism (SUC)

9. Superultramodern Ethical / Aesthetical Relativism (SEAR)

Most of the mysteries ( or problems ) in modern / ultramodern science are resolved in Superultramodern Science. In some sense SS seems to be the culmination of human intellectual progress as the problems in SS demand superhuman intelligence to be solved.


About the Author
Dr Kedar Joshi, BSc MA DSc DA, PBSSI, MRI
Cambridge, UK.

Father of Superultramodern Science (FSS)

The Founder as well as the President of
British Superultramodern Scientific Institution (BSSI)

The mission of BSSI is to advance Superultramodern Science.

kedarkj1@rediffmail.com




http://superultramodern.blogspot.com

Superultramodern Ethical / Aesthetical Relativism (SEAR) by Dr Kedar Joshi, PBSSI



According to Superultramodern Ethical/Aesthetical Relativism (SEAR) nothing is absolutely good or bad (or beautiful or ugly), but, as Shakespeare said, thinking makes it so. The novelty in SEAR is its foundations. A thinks C (say an idea) is good while B thinks C is bad. Now it seems that there can be no logical or conceptual criteria to determine if A, for example, is right or wrong. The law of syllogism ( if p implies q and q implies r then p implies r ), for example, is logically true in the sense that one ( at least I ) has to think ( apart from the principle of universal doubt ) that it is true and if someone thinks it to be false then it is his/her inability to see the truth in the law of syllogism or, more importantly, to understand what the law of syllogism states or the concepts it involves. So the principles like the law of syllogism are supposed to be eternal as they cannot be otherwise. They have to be the way they are forever, regardless of individual minds. However, this does not apply to ethical judgments, as one can reasonably think otherwise. The concepts good and bad allow far more flexibility, and if one, for example, thinks that it is good to hurt others for ones own pleasure, this thinking involves no conceptual contradiction, as that is the way that person defines the concept of goodness. And how can there be any logical/conceptual/reasonable restriction on how one defines goodness or badness ? In case of the law of syllogism once we are clear about the terms p, q, r, and implication, the truth cannot logically/conceptually/ reasonably be denied. Ethical concepts are thus vague concepts. Concepts like implication, on the other hand, are concrete or clear. ( It is a different thing that if we mean to call dog, for example, as implication then it is a mere attaching of the label implication to the concept of dog as dog is also nothing but a label attached to some concept. )

In this particular world majority of people more or less agree on ethical definitions because their minds are constructed that way ( i.e. Programs are created to generate appropriate states of consciousness.) In the NSTP ( Non - Spatial Thinking Process ) theoretical terms if the non - spatial universal program is changed people would disagree or think different way/s.

SEAR is a component of Superultramodern Science (SS).


About the Author
The Founder as well as the President of British Superultramodern Scientific Institution (BSSI)
http://superultramodern.blogspot.com